From what you can tell, do you think that the AMs are fairly applying FR policies to members?
I realize you didn't ask me, but my opinion is they're doing as good a job as humanly possible. The one thing I do every now and then is report incidences of abuse - and they are 99% consistent in what they delete and what they don't. Every now and then a post with a word won't get deleted even though a different post with the same word in the past was - but that can be chalked to human error/bias.. and is understandable to an extent.
Honestly I am not capapble of assessing that, and I don't think any one person here can do that other than Jim. (Although a combination of people that do experience different aspects of FR would be valuable to tap for feedback on this question.) I do not read every thread on FR, I miss plenty.
Its actually a difficult assertion to make that the mods are uneven, so I am cautious. For example, if I see a post was removed from a thread I have no idea why. It could be the poster has asked that it be removed, there was something innappropriate said (racist, sexist, personal information), or the like.
There is no way for me to follow everythread that was pulled and assess whether it was a "just or unjust" act in pulling it.
To make it short, I would say that I lack the necessary information to even make that assertion.