Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: disclaimer
Since it is clearly not required, then it should be at the option of the person having the proceedure. Got that?!

Thanx for agreeing with me. Bottom line: God did NOT condemn circumcision. If it was the HORRIBLE practice that Doc claims, at NO POINT would it have been recommended. Got that?

612 posted on 08/01/2002 5:23:05 AM PDT by PJ-Comix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 611 | View Replies ]


To: PJ-Comix
Thanx for agreeing with me. Bottom line: God did NOT condemn circumcision. If it was the HORRIBLE practice that Doc claims, at NO POINT would it have been recommended. Got that?

The point is that circumcision is NOT REQUIRED and is OPTIONAL. The person subjected to circumcision MUST have a choice of accepting it or not.

You make the mistake of thinking that the Old Testament style of circumcision is the same as the modern method using a specially designed clamp. In the old days, a SYMBOLIC portion of skin was removed, now almost the complete foreskin is taken away. What was called circumcision in the Old Testament is not the same as circumcision is today - today the practice is much more destructive.

613 posted on 08/01/2002 8:27:28 AM PDT by disclaimer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 612 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson