[Doc On The Bay]

Abraham was a Man--acting on what he believed were "Divine Instructions!"

THINK!!--Would a "Loving God" DELIBERATELY "GELD" a "Creation" he made "Out of a Father's Love??"

WHY NOT simply create "MAN" WITHOUT a Foreskin??

What kind of "Father" would require his Children to Sexually mutilate their Infants??

There is SOMETHING WRONG HERE___

Doc

[PJ-Comix]

There is SOMETHING WRONG HERE___

So why don't you take it upon yourself to rewrite the Bible?

[PJ-Comix]

THINK!!--Would a "Loving God" DELIBERATELY "GELD" a "Creation" he made "Out of a Father's Love??"

Oh, and Doc, after you read that Gideon Bible, try reading a Webster's DICTIONARY. "GELD" is completely DIFFERENT than "CIRCUMCISE."

[crystalk]

As a doctor, you should be aware that to circumcize a man does not "geld" = castrate and thus sterilize, him. It does not even do what a vasectomy would, that is, sterilize him without making him impotent or feminized. It only has esthetic and hygienic advantages, unless one be of such religion(s) including Islam by the way, which require it...

But your post had the effect of saying that this was merely a human folly, while my post says that, to a believer, God himself may have mandated or even performed, the operation on occasion.