Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hyatt hotel heir Tony Pritzker is embroiled in $3.7 BILLION divorce from wife of 33 years and demands judge enforce prenup with his massive estate - the third largest home in LA - now on the line
daily mail ^

Posted on 10/07/2023 11:22:07 AM PDT by algore

Tony Pritzker, heir to the Hyatt hotel chain, is divorcing his wife of 33 years and asking a judge to enforce the prenup to protect his $3.7billion fortune.

Documents obtained by DailyMail.com show Pritzker, 62, and his wife Jeanne Pritzker have split citing 'irreconcilable differences' and he claims she refuses to sign a document acknowledging that their prenup is valid and enforceable.

There is much at stake, including the couple's behemoth known as 'the Pritzker Estate', which was the second largest residential property in Los Angeles when construction was completed in 2012.

The 50,000 sq.ft. property is in the exclusive Beverly Crest area of Los Angeles, between Beverly Hills and Bel Air, and has sweeping 180 degree views of the city.

Tony and Jeanne married on July 29, 1989 and according to documents have been separated since September 2022.

The pair jointly signed a premarital agreement just one week before their wedding, documents claim.

Now, Tony, who runs the Pritzker Group private equity firm, claims in court filings that Jeanne has refused to acknowledge the prenup as valid and enforceable.

According to divorce documents, the prenup states that 'all earnings by the parties during their marriage are the separate property of the earning party' and that 'certain joint property shall be divided equally between' the couple.

It also states that there is a limit to how much spousal support Jeanne is entitled to receive.

Tony's attorney, 'disso queen' Laura Wasser, who is fresh off her win in Kevin Costner's divorce, has filed documents to force Jeanne to either acknowledge or officially challenge the prenuptial agreement.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Heated Discussion
KEYWORDS: hyatt; prickster; pritzker
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last
I am sure she is really nice, but she looks like the Harvard educated squatter ladys sister
1 posted on 10/07/2023 11:22:07 AM PDT by algore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: algore
But who nose


2 posted on 10/07/2023 11:26:30 AM PDT by algore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: algore

You would think someone that rich could “afford” someone less ick.
The divorce would still have happened but it might have been less scary getting up in the morning.


3 posted on 10/07/2023 11:28:54 AM PDT by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: algore

His brother is the PoS governor of Illinois.

https://www.forbes.com/profile/anthony-pritzker/?sh=4564a5404a32


4 posted on 10/07/2023 11:28:56 AM PDT by fretzer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: algore

Related to teh Governor of Illinois?


5 posted on 10/07/2023 11:29:13 AM PDT by TBP (Decent people cannot fathom the amoral cruelty of the Biden regime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: algore

Pritzker family is nothing but left-wing slime

https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/the-money-behind-the-transgender-movement/


6 posted on 10/07/2023 11:30:45 AM PDT by euram (allALL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

To: algore

His brother must have eaten all the chow.


8 posted on 10/07/2023 11:34:45 AM PDT by alternatives?
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: algore

Doesn’t matter how she looks or how he acts, she signed a pre-nup, her signature is on it, and in court she should lose totally. The fact that she SIGNED a pre-nup shows she knew what was possible.

Just because the terms aren’t to her liking now, men need to defend themselves against predatory judges.


9 posted on 10/07/2023 11:35:18 AM PDT by wbarmy (Trying to do better.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zathras

I would expect a prenup to have a timeline connected to increased property shares going to the wife as decades pass.


10 posted on 10/07/2023 11:38:36 AM PDT by aimhigh (1 John 3:23 "And THIS is His commandment . . . . ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: algore

Nice cheek implants horse face. Hope they both kill each other.


11 posted on 10/07/2023 11:39:57 AM PDT by HYPOCRACY (This is the dystopian future we've been waiting for!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wbarmy

Thirty-three years is long enough to have a court look it over. A lot can happen in that time. Not saying it did or that it might make a difference but with that much money it might be worth a significant amount of it going to lawyers just to make sure everything is legit. I’m on her side even though she is unattractive to me.

Besides, if he wants to stick to the prenuptial agreement, it means he doesn’t think the 33 years is worth offering her enough to keep from needing to bring it up. Dick move.


12 posted on 10/07/2023 11:41:54 AM PDT by webheart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: wbarmy
I just wish there was a way for both of them to lose.

image host

13 posted on 10/07/2023 11:57:31 AM PDT by absalom01 (You should do your duty in all things. You cannot do more, and you should never wish to do less.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: webheart

I disagree. She probably demanded the pre-nup, most men when they were first starting in business don’t think about it.


14 posted on 10/07/2023 12:03:04 PM PDT by wbarmy (Trying to do better.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: webheart

Prenupts are not bulletproof.

However it is better to have one than not—certainly helps his negotiating position.


15 posted on 10/07/2023 12:04:35 PM PDT by cgbg ("Creative minds have always been known to survive any kind of bad training." Anna Freud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: algore; SaveFerris; PROCON; gundog

16 posted on 10/07/2023 12:10:12 PM PDT by Larry Lucido (Donate! Don't just post clickbait!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: HYPOCRACY

Sorry, what are “cheek implants“? Do people get such things?


17 posted on 10/07/2023 12:17:45 PM PDT by nwrep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TBP

Yep


18 posted on 10/07/2023 12:35:57 PM PDT by maro (MAGA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: aimhigh

“I would expect a prenup to have a timeline connected to increased property shares going to the wife as decades pass.”

No kidding. Pretty obvious term for a prenup, isn’t it? Maybe even put an expiration date in it, say 20 years.


19 posted on 10/07/2023 12:51:52 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom (“Occupy your mind with good thoughts or your enemy will fill them with bad ones.” ~ Thomas More)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: algore

Well he could claim the house is not even worth 18 million, I mean look at Mar-a-logo, that’s worth 18 million, so my house must be worth less.... 😂😂😂😂


20 posted on 10/07/2023 12:55:32 PM PDT by Lockbox (politicians, they all seemed like game show hosts to me.... Sting…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson