Posted on 03/07/2023 4:35:03 PM PST by Olog-hai
Fox Corp. Chairman Rupert Murdoch said under oath that he believes the 2020 presidential election was free, fair and not stolen, according to court filings released Tuesday in a voting machine company’s defamation lawsuit over Fox News’ coverage of former President Donald Trump’s unfounded election fraud claims.
In sworn questioning in January by lawyers for Dominion Voting Systems, Murdoch was asked, “Do you believe that the 2020 presidential election was free and fair?”
“Yes,” he replied, according to a transcript.
“The election was not stolen,” he said later. …
(Excerpt) Read more at apnews.com ...
So what? Who is he? Just talk to hrtvyge Leftist media off FOX’S back regarding the Jan 6 recordings.
Of course he does, he’s knee-deep in the fix
Did he talk with this person? Or any of the people who said they observed fraud?
https://rumble.com/v1fshqp-ruby-freeman-georgia-2020-confession-instagram.html
WTF does this slob know?
F him.
Yeah because during the greatest economy with a man who hid in his basement while the other guy consistently had record rallies, the basement dweller with the 7 person rallies got 40% more votes than the first black president who had previously had a record turnout just a decade before.
In the years 1644-1646, over 100 people confessed to being witches when questioned under-oath by Matthew Hopkins, The Witchfinder General.
Its amazing what people will say when they are grilled by ruling democrat Inquisitors.
We will see what Murdoch has to say when those same rat inquisitors are put under the guillotine.
So does Sean, Tucker, Brett and all of FOX. But then again, so does 90%+ of America.
Well, that settles it!
The Australian-English something or other Globalist guy sez it’s all good, trust me!
Guess we can all get back to worrying about ball game scores and how much we owe the cretinous FJB regime for the privilege of being their serfs.
Move on indeed!
90 percent? Somehow I think not.
Well, that settles it!
Senile...
Trump lost by 43,000 votes spread across three states.
How many ineligible voters?
Unknown.
How many ballots with no chain of custody?
Unknown.
.
Jan 6, 2020 is now no more relevant to 2024 than who killed JFK... or Linkcoln...or the Whiskey Rebellion.
Americans look to the future. Anyone who lives in the past needs to re-evaluate priorities.
"Fox Chair Murdoch says 2020 election was fair: court filings"
FR: Never Accept the Premise of Your Opponent’s Argument
All that the court of public opinion needs to do to find something suspicious about the 2020 elections, including the J6 vote to accept Biden's challenged votes, is to compare the electoral vote-counting confusion that began on the evening of Election Day in some states with 12th Amendment (12A) procedures for electoral votes.
Excerpted from 12A:
"The Electors shall meet in their respective states, and vote by ballot for President and Vice-President, one of whom, at least, shall not be an inhabitant of the same state with themselves; they shall name in their ballots the person voted for as President, and in distinct ballots the person voted for as Vice-President, and they shall make distinct lists of all persons voted for as President, and of all persons voted for as Vice- President, and of the number of votes for each, which lists they shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed to the seat of the government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate [emphasis added], ..."
“3. The Constitution was written to be understood by the voters; its words and phrases were used in their normal and ordinary as distinguished from technical meaning; where the intention is clear, there is no room for construction and no excuse for interpolation or addition.” —United States v. Sprague, 1931.
For example, not only does 12A not say anything about politically correct state winner-take-all laws for electoral votes which effectively give some electors more than one vote while nullifying the votes of other electors, but also consider the following.
With unconstitutionally nullified electoral electoral votes in mind, note that Justice Joseph Story had pointed out that the effect of political parties dividing a state's electoral votes is that the state's electoral votes are effectively neutralized, as opposed to the results of 12A-ignoring state winner-take-all laws.
"In case of any party divisions in a state, it may neutralize its whole vote [emphasis added], while all the other states give an unbroken electoral vote." —Justice Joseph Story, Article 2, Section 1, Clauses 2 and 3, Commentaries on the Constitution 3, 1833."
Patriots, the bottom line is this imo. What is your threshold of “pain” for peacefully stopping unconstitutionally big state and federal governments controlled by bully, constitutionally undefined political parties, from oppressing the people under their boots?
The inevitable remedy for ongoing, post-17A ratification, corrupt political party treason (imo)...
All MAGA patriots need to wake up their RINO federal and state lawmakers by making the following clear to them.
If they don’t publicly support either a resolution, or a Constitutional Convention, to effectively "secede" ALL the states from the unconstitutionally big federal government by amending the Constitution to repeal the 16th (direct taxes) and 17th (popular voting for federal senators) Amendments (16&17A), doing so before the primary elections in 2024, that YOU will primary them.
If the proposed amendment was limited strictly to repealing 16&17A, relatively little or ideally no discussion would be needed before ratification of the amendment imo.
With 16&17A out of the way, my hope is that Trump 47 becomes the FIRST president of a truly constitutionally limited power federal government.
In the meanwhile, I'm not holding my breath for significant MAGA legislation to appear in the first 100 days of new term for what may still prove to be another RINO-controlled House.
Trump will hopefully do another round of primarying RINOs for 2024 elections.
“Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”What do you mean to say by advising “look to the future”?
— George Santayana
Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.
— Party slogan, 1984
The one relevant word missing in this thread so far is “lawful”, as in, was the election lawful or not. The margin of victory has nothing to do with whether an election was lawful or not.
Well, what does “stolen” imply?
The Bible teaches to look to the future. The Old Testament looks for the Messiah. The New Testament tells us to look to the future.
At a more specfic level, Israelites fleeing Egypt made a mistake when they looked back to Egypt. Lot’s wife made a mistake when she looked back to the party life she used to live in sin city.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.