Article said the AI (1 or a 0 generator) is named “inventor” but can not apply or be granted a patent didn’t it? The AI was derived from written software so logic would dictate that the IT guy/ gal would get awarded the patent or group / company the developers worked for....
You may be correct. I did not make the distinction between “Inventor” and “Patent Holder”, and that may make all the difference in the world.
But I don’t like it. It smacks of something to be abused by malignant intentions. No stone left unturned and all.