[BenLurkin]

Is there a link to an actual news article on this?

[Jan_Sobieski]

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/997418/Variants_of_Concern_VOC_Technical_Briefing_17.pdf

[JayGalt]

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/996740/Variants_of_Concern_VOC_Technical_Briefing_17.pdf

The comments were reportedly abstracted from this report

[Leaning Right]

> Is there a link to an actual news article on this? <

I followed the original poster’s link, and got lost in the weeds. The one chart I saw about Covid deaths did not have much of a breakdown by age, and none about underlying conditions. So as for me, I’m as confused as before.

[TexasGator]

Here is their linked source.

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/997418/Variants_of_Concern_VOC_Technical_Briefing_17.pdf

[M. Thatcher]

Is there a link to an actual news article on this?

Of course not.

But you can read the raw data. See link here

From "SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern and variants under investigation in England, Technical briefing 17" published by Public Health England

and link to specific chart (p. 14) here

Deaths within 28 days of positive specimen date:

2 doses: 50
unvaccinated: 44

[hsmomx3]

Every darned day, a new report comes out and contradicts reports on both sides (vaccinated vs not vaccinated).

Which is it?

It’s frustrating but deep down, I feel it is those who have received the vax that will suffer the most.

[Mariner]

The sensational blog doesn’t provide a link to the actual article or the report.

When I read the report Friday it said that was a one week snapshot for the UK.

It’s just an effort to stir emotions in the ignorant.