Posted on 02/04/2021 10:35:00 AM PST by Olog-hai
I will say this about Pulitzer he is going about it differently.
To use the old game “Clue” Rudy said: “The maid, in the kitchen, with a butcher knife”
Pulitzer is saying: “Somebody in the kitchen, with either a knife or a club. I can’t know until I examine the ballots.”
It is actually possible, though it seems unlikely, that The Dominion is telling the truth, and that they had nothing to do with the issues and and someone else, the DNC, CIA, FBI or the PRC orchestrated the steal.
He was not telling the truth. Not investigating does not mean no evidence.
They can’t cover it all up. They’re betting on the judges refusing to allow discovery yet again.
You’re presuming honest judges.
You’ve got the judges you’ve got. It’s like terrain in battle, you don’t always get your choice, either fight or turn tail and admit defeat, but don’t make excuses or propose alternative realities.
Corrupt judiciary is not an “excuse”. There us a reason the phrase “judge shopping” was coined.
Anyone who says the machines were dishonest had better put up proof (defined as ‘proof the courts will look at and accept’) or have some deep pockets.“
The question must be asked in court. We’re any of the Dominion or Smartmatic voting machines connected to the internet or “WiFi network” in any way.
Yes. Or. No.
Yes -they are screwed. No- they are screwed in spades. I believe there are people who have proof that yes. They all were connected to the internet. And by doing so allowed persons to manipulate ballots on a massive scale. The proof is there. We saw it in real time just by watching the numbers on tv or internet.
Giuliani might make the defense that he was drunk. Patrick Byrne says Giuliani was regularly blotto.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.