Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: heterosupremacist

Her very long association with the Playboy company makes her statement hypocritical......Why? Playboy is NOT pornographic.


25 posted on 09/01/2016 1:07:51 PM PDT by Safetgiver (Islam makes barbarism look genteel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: Safetgiver

Maybe nor porno, but slutty as can be...


27 posted on 09/01/2016 1:09:10 PM PDT by heterosupremacist ("Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God." (Thomas Jefferson))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: Safetgiver

The Playboy channel is. It’s all part of one company and the profit she brought to it was spread over all its divisions.


47 posted on 09/01/2016 1:50:41 PM PDT by CaptainK (...please make it stop. Shake a can of pennies at it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: Safetgiver

Years ago my girlfriend bought me a subscription to Playboy. Why? She liked the articles and cartoons and such. Me too. Playboy might be seen as pornographic if you are about 12y.o. Or if you have never seen a naked woman. Personally, I like women. Naked or not.

During that time was when Pam posed for Playboy. Twice. Fine specimen of the female form. Now? Well I don’t know. That was about 25 years ago or so.


51 posted on 09/01/2016 2:01:27 PM PDT by saleman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson