Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Bull Snipe
Exactly which unalienable rights had the Buchanan Administration so egregiously violated that secession from the Union was the only answer?

The South was tolerant of the Buchanan administration. It was the election of Lincoln that convinced them there could be no compatibility.

Lincoln was the Barack Obama of his day.

Extreme Liberal from Illinois, obsessed with Racial issues, and intending to use every executive order at his disposal to undermine what was then existing law. Willing to misuse and abuse the Federal government to advance his own agenda, and to whom no one would stand up and tell him he was exceeding his authority.

His position was "If you want your slavery, you can keep your slavery." But nobody in the South believed him. They thought he was an opportunistic liar who exploited increasingly popular Liberal ideas from places like Massachusetts.

Southerners realized he couldn't be trusted to respect their rights; that he would undermine them in any way he could, and so they decided to preemptively solve the problem by exercising their voluntary right to leave the Union which was formed by their previous consent.

(Just as the Declaration of Independence said any people have a right to do.)

79 posted on 01/20/2016 11:17:30 AM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp

So what you are saying that the States seceded from the Union because they thought Abe Lincoln might interfere with their property right to own other human beings as chattel slaves.


82 posted on 01/20/2016 11:21:49 AM PST by Bull Snipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson