“...I linked to the ConservativeTreehouse which several of your pals have said was a solid source.
ConservativeTreehouse has been used here to post a thread which was used to support how the police shot 1000’s of rounds and slaughtered the bikers.”
****************************************************************************************************
Dude, you REALLY need to work on your reading comprehension and your critical thinking skills. Yes, you linked to a Conservative Treehouse item that extracted from a Washington Post article. You apparently believed every little piece of crap from the anonymous/unnamed source(s) that was put forth in that extract.
Go back to your linked article in Conservative Treehouse and look at the 7 “bullet items” at the end of the article under “Here are the notable issues within this witness outline as reported:”. Conservative Treehouse was reporting on, and linking to, the (IMHO Bogus) Washington Post article and at the end they were trying to warn the reader that it may well be BULL CRAP. In other words, they were trying to make sure their readers were exercising critical thinking skills. Try those skills, you may like it! Or at least you may be less easily manipulated in to believing phony narratives.
“Dude, you REALLY need to work on your reading comprehension and your critical thinking skills.”
The ConservativeTreehouse conclusion on the the article:
“That said, it is cogent, plausible and -for the most part- the most complete account so far of what actually happened in the immediate moments when the violence first began.”
*This report goes from “punches” directly to “shots fired”; and doesn’t construct, outline or question the moment-by-moment scene, other than a chaos sentence after the first shot was fired, despite the reporter(s) expending exhaustive text on the backstory.
“At that point in time, the sergeant in arms shot Richie point-blank,” the Cossack said.
Enough said.