Yet the dark child Mark claims is he, is at least five years old in 1966.’
IS EXACTLY WHAT I WROTE.
But Mark never claimed he was at least five years old in ‘66.
‘It is I who claims the family group image dates from 1966.’
But you have no independent corroboration of that date. You are guessing at a date for the photo based on your theory. So the photo in no way bolsters your theory. If you had independent verification of the date of the photo then it would be useful to your theory. But if you use your theory to date the photo, then it is valueless as evidence. Your argument reduces to, ‘I am right because I am right’.
And you are reduced to being unable to debate me. All you can offer is ‘you are wrong’ - and that’s useless, it offers nothing.