Note, please, that I have not commented on Obama, specifically, only on the prevailing American citizenship law as of the time in question.
Among the people concerned with Obama's eligibility, there is a broad misunderstanding of those laws. I am trying to correct those misperceptions.
I have not taken a position on Obama's status because, frankly, I don't know -- for sure -- what the circumstances of his birth were. I am fairly certain, though, that they are not as claimed. But I have no idea in which regard the public information is in error.
IGNORANCE ON PARADE
it’s that part of your tagline that maybe best describes your reply. You maintain you haven’t commented on obama, but that’s what this thread is about. We’re not talking about Fidel Castro...or that chinaman who had an Hawaiian birth certificate but wasn’t born in Hawaii. You can’t hide your head in the sand, imo. You don’t know who the man is, where he came from, or who his parents were/are, and any citizenship discussions in relation to him just aren’t applicable.
If you can’t acknowledge who your comments refer to, then do we take it it’s purely academic and you don’t care who he is or where he came from?
Somehow, sometime along the line, everyone needs to take a stand. The question won’t go away by ignoring it exists.
WHO IS HE?