If you had read the research threads since summer 2008 as I have, you’d see that the comments by some people on the topic have weight and evidence behind them, and many do not. Fred Nerks’ comments have evidence and weight. The top notch research that’s been done, tells a significant story.
At this point, anyone who thinks otherwise, either has not been paying any attention, or has some axe to grind.
And how quickly we can spot them now, but from time to time, one or two still slip through the filter. One thing makes them stand out; they never contribute anything useful.
Or they are too darn lazy or tired to read the links or check out the sources provided. It's so much easier to watch a DVD made by some scumbag fraud who has done more to derail discussion than anyone else I can think of, other than the 'academic' who posted the link to the images of the model that he maintains were sent to him by an anonymous genealogist...