Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Fred Nerks

Anyone who has read an etiquette book or had a grandmother who had memorized many etiquette books would know the difference between junior and II.

Naming a child with the same name as the father and appending II rather than junior is the product of ignorance or pretension.


132 posted on 03/08/2014 8:30:22 PM PST by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]


To: ladyjane
...Naming a child with the same name as the father and appending II rather than junior is the product of ignorance or pretension.

NOT IN ENGLAND. And Kenya was an english colony.

136 posted on 03/08/2014 8:45:13 PM PST by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies ]

To: ladyjane
...Anyone who has read an etiquette book or had a grandmother who had memorized many etiquette books would know the difference between junior and II.

I just noticed, is that why you call yourself ladyjane Royalty, are we?

You could be ladyjane the second, and if you named a daughter ladyjane, she could be ladyjane the third.

And she could write Ladyjane III requests the pleasure of your company for afternoon tea... if you lived in England.

137 posted on 03/08/2014 8:58:52 PM PST by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies ]

To: ladyjane
Naming a child with the same name as the father and appending II rather than junior is the product of ignorance or pretension.

We're talking colonial native bourgeois class here. Pretension is a strong possibility. And ignorance isn't far behind.

167 posted on 03/08/2014 11:35:21 PM PST by Bubba Ho-Tep ("More weight!"--Giles Corey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson