[WildHighlander57]

Hmmm, the DNA testers grabbed the wrong DNA to test... should have gotten Maya’s.

There’s a hole right there in what shrimpton is saying ..... he claimed the c i a got samples from the grandparents.

Claiming the c I a did the tests isn’t verifiable, because all those guys will say when asked is “we can neither confirm nor deny” .

Its their standard response.

[hoosiermama]

Yes it’s not the grandparents DNA that relevant SADO could have been adopted. It’s the sisters that should have been compared
Still want background of the source of these videos

Why are they showing up now if they were around in 2008. When did they get posted on line. Has someone been holding them till now? Why?

[MMaschin]

Hmmm, the DNA testers grabbed the wrong DNA to test... should have gotten Maya’s.

There’s a hole right there in what shrimpton is saying ..... he claimed the c i a got samples from the grandparents.

Claiming the c I a did the tests isn’t verifiable, because all those guys will say when asked is “we can neither confirm nor deny” .

Its their standard response.


The speech in the video appears to be from early 2008, and at that time, Madelyn Dunham was still alive. Her DNA would have been very easy to aquire.

What I find most interesting was when he said SAD was not pregnant in July 1961. What if a photo of a clearly non-pregnant SAD, at a verifiable July 1961 event, was to turn up? Would that constitute 'universe shattering' evedence? One thing is, eveidence like that is something average people can wrap their heads around.