Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Ray76
Suggest you read Article II.

Thank you but I'm already very familiar with Article II.

As I pointed out to you, a person who is naturalized is a person who becomes a citizen "subsequent" to birth and not "at" birth.

99 posted on 07/21/2013 10:44:58 AM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]


To: FreeReign

Read the law.


101 posted on 07/21/2013 10:46:53 AM PDT by Ray76 (An armed society is a polite society.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]

To: FreeReign
As I pointed out to you, a person who is naturalized is a person who becomes a citizen "subsequent" to birth and not "at" birth.

A person is "naturalized" according to any requirement congress wants. Congress put in the stipulation that it be "at birth" but they could have stipulated six months after, had they wished. They DID stipulate an AGE requirement for the mother. If the mother is too young, the child doesn't get any citizenship. Does that sound like "natural born" to you?

The point is, you are confusing citizenship by an act of law with being a "natural citizenship", merely because it happens at birth.

306 posted on 07/21/2013 3:28:03 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson