Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: 0.E.O
If you're going lay out laws on naturalization then don't you first have to define those who don't acquire citizenship through the naturalization process?

LOL! No. The power is to make a uniform rule, no more. Does it say Congress has the authority to define natural born? No, it does not.

The Constitutional Rule - 'that which is not included is therefore excluded' still applies, despite any attempt someone may make to enumerate out their penumbra.

514 posted on 07/22/2013 8:40:56 AM PDT by MamaTexan (I am a Person as defined by the Law of Nature, not a 'person' as defined by the laws of Man)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 511 | View Replies ]


To: MamaTexan
LOL! No. The power is to make a uniform rule, no more. Does it say Congress has the authority to define natural born? No, it does not.

How do you make a uniform rule without first identifying those who need to be naturalized from those who don't? Those Congress say don't need to be naturalized would be considered natural born citizens.

516 posted on 07/22/2013 8:59:27 AM PDT by 0.E.O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 514 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson