Our own political expediency is not the basis upon which we should uphold our laws. It is unfortunate that these circumstances exist, because Ted Cruz might very well be a very good choice for President.
At this point, if he can secure the nomination, I would vote for him, though I am certain his candidacy violates both the spirit and the letter of the law.
At this point, if he can secure the nomination, I would vote for him, though I am certain his candidacy violates both the spirit and the letter of the law.
At this point, if he can secure the nomination, I would vote for him, though I am certain his candidacy violates both the spirit and the letter of the law.
Frankly, despite all the arguments on this thread, I'm not sure - and stated that in my original post. However, I, too, would vote for Ted Cruz should his eligibility (NBC) pass constitutional muster. If not, we're likely to get Hillary Clinton, who will finish what Obama started - the economic gutting of the U.S. economy and destruction of the American middle class. Well - and I mean this seriously, not as sarcasm - at least we won't be guilty of political expediency and will have honored the constitution. There is that consolation - and, in my view - it should not be considered insignificant to conservatives.