Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Jim Scott

I’m sorry you find following the Constitution strident.

Too bad Cruz couldn’t have stated the fact the he is INELIGIBLE. Instead, he wants to ignore the USURPER in the White House and lend him legitimacy.

He’s a politician looking out for himself not the Constitution. You know, the job’s he’s paid to do.

Cruz is an enabler of THE ONE.


313 posted on 07/21/2013 3:39:39 PM PDT by Smokeyblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 302 | View Replies ]


To: Smokeyblue
I’m sorry you find following the Constitution strident.

I'm sorry that you deliberately misread what I actually posted. I stated that the arguments against Cruz's constitutional eligibility to be president were sometimes strident. The 500+ preceding posts verify that observation.

Too bad Cruz couldn’t have stated the fact the he is INELIGIBLE. Instead, he wants to ignore the USURPER in the White House and lend him legitimacy.

He’s a politician looking out for himself not the Constitution. You know, the job’s he’s paid to do.

Cruz is an enabler of THE ONE.

That is an inane comment. It clearly infers that Ted Cruz, one of the most genuinely conservative members of the senate, is some kind of leftist plant. Absolute rubbish.

Debating the eligibility of Cruz to meet the constitutional requirement for serving as president is fair game but bashing an authentic conservative politician who serves his constituency well is typical of leftist trolls masquerading as über conservatives and bedrock constitutionalists on politically conservative website message boards. There really is such a thing as overplaying one's hand.

529 posted on 07/22/2013 12:10:41 PM PDT by Jim Scott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 313 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson