Defining the meaning of terms used in the Constitution is exactly the role envisioned by the Founders for the Supremes.
If they were to rule, it would at least settle the issue legally. Though doubtless not all would agree with the ruling.
Yes, we see how well they do that with the Obamacare law which they recently upheld as a "tax." Also, we see how well they've done with Kelo, with Roe, and with Wickard.
Are you sure you want to rely on that pack of kooks?
If they were to rule, it would at least settle the issue legally. Though doubtless not all would agree with the ruling.
Those who are correct, would remain so, and those who are incorrect would still be incorrect. The only difference is one opinion (Most likely the incorrect one) would be enforced with government guns and boots.