This simply isn't true.
Generally speaking, people who believe it takes both have "educated" themselves only with the writings of cranks and quacks.
Those who have studied the meaning of natural born citizen in our history and law don't think that way.
There's not a single major legal scholar in the entire country, or a single significant conservative legal foundation, who makes that claim.
Not one.
Your comments are the alphaebtic equivalent of dog poop on a sidewalk.
Best if carefully avoided, anything else spreads the stink around.
Not one.
Every historian, every constitutional lawyer, every constitutional law professor, every politician, every party functionary -- and all of the politically-aware citizens -- knew from the time of his announcement that Barack Obama's daddy had been born in Kenya. And was, thus, a British subject and, subsequently, a citizen of Kenya. And that he was in the USA on a student visa when he fathered Barack Obama II.
Barack Obama II was even at pains to tell us all this in his books.
Yet, nobody, absolutely nobody, nary a one of these acknowledged and "well-educated" experts raised a solitary question about Obama's eligibility for the office of President of the United States.
Why would that be, do you suppose?
Could it be because, under the known circumstances, he was, in fact, eligible?
Or was it a grand conspiracy, organized by the almight "they"? Or was everybody -- literally everybody -- paralyzed by Obama's semi-blackness?
Occam's Razor supports the notion that it's the former...
Another idiot post by the community idiot.