Posted on 07/14/2013 3:53:35 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
What is the evidence that Zimmerman confronted Martin?
None.
He’s suggesting the Feds have to step in and re-try the case because the prosecutors botched it. BS. The experienced prosecutors gave it their best shot. They just didn’t have enough evidence to support any theory of the case.
Flat out lie. He committed, at least, battery.
Even this author admits there was no racial motive! And he equates neighborhood watch with the LAPD.
Let’s face it a federal trial here can only be because our government is being run by black racists.
Hutchinson is confused - he appears to want Holder to try the “Stand Your Ground” law and find it guilty of Impinging Upon Blackness, not to actually retry George Zimmerman for anything.
What compelling reason? Trayvon Martin is Obama’s illegitimate son. Come now the punk was no better than a New Black Panther adherent. Lets face it Holder has to protect yet another terrorist, thug, malcontent, deviant and so on and so forth.
The piece of scum is dead. Zimmerman was freed of any wrongdoing!
Move on Feds Move on. Got bigger things to do - Benghazi, IRS.
Duh i get it the low information voters need to get emotional about something.
Hey in Chicago an female honor student was shot and killed several months ago. What about the justice there?
Swap the names everywhere and it might make sense. But TM is dead so no point having a civil rights investigation into his actions.
What is “profiling” and why on earth should it be illegal?
Probably some of the same phonies who were babbling: “If you see something, say something,” only a few short months ago
Apparently that is now a no no! If you see something and say something that shows “ill will” and profiling.
the sanford cops did their investigation and concluded self defense, yet we still had a trial.
Well there’s no evidence that Zimmerman prevented Martin’s movements prior to the act of self defense. To the contrary, we know that Martin was on top and preventing Zimmerman’s movement.
Is there not supposed to be a barf alert with this?
From the article: “The defense and prosecution agreed that Martin did not commit a crime, was not even suspected of a crime, and was on a public thoroughfare when he was killed.”
Uh...no. When he was killed, Trayvon Martin was engaged in assaulting another person, George Zimmerman. Young Mr. Martin was pummeling the older, less fit Mr. Zimmerman, beating him about head and face, pounding his head onto concrete. Beating him to the point where Mr. Zimmerman was in fear for his life.
Nope, not buyin’ the innocent youth argument. Not for a minute.
That investigation was premature, as they hadn't been told what their findings were going to be yet.
This is such a stretch of reasoning.
First of all, the LAPD officers who beat Rodney King were REALLY police officers. They had REAL authority, not this new "presumptive authority" standard the author is trying to proffer.
Second, there is no "quasi-legal" anything to do with Zimmerman. He was a citizen who was coordinating with local police to keep his neighborhood safe. That's what we want, right?
What happened to "If you see something, say something?" George Zimmerman was in a position to "say something" to the local PD. In fact, it's better for local PD to know who the key people are in various housing areas, in order to optimize their ability to respond to a trusted source, instead of having to guess what the situation will be each time they're called into a neighborhood.
Liberals are twisting themselves into pretzels trying to justify why they are so zealous in going after Zimmerman. Their arguments are nothing but one contradiction after another after another.
-PJ
Mark Nejame, famed Orlando attorney, doesn’t think a federal case stands a chance in hell. All of the witnesses were deposed and heard in open court, the rules of discovery in Florida are among the most liberal in the country, the trial was televised before the nation and fully transparent, and the justice department already investigated wrondgoing, via the Sanford PD and Zimmerman. Even the prosecutors said this “wasn’t about racial profiling”. If the federal government has the idiocy to proceed, then we DO live under the tyranny of a monarchist-like government that overrules the Laws of the Land. Shame on Mr. Holder if he takes and eats this race bait.
“The nature of the evidence is irrelevant; it’s the seriousness of the charge that matters.”
Rush Limbaugh
~:” Though there was no apparent racial motive in Zimmerman’s confronting Martin, his action clearly violated Martin’s right to exercise his freedom of movement. “
Like bashing Zimmerman’s head on the sidewalk while straddling him.
Oh, how I despise these people.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.