Especially after the biggest Constitutional birther here referred to the writings of our Founding Fathers, their generation, and all of our early legal experts as "horsesh*t" and "crap."
That is a damned lie. Diogenese Lamp, you need to read the slander this fool just posted about you, without adding your name of course. Slandering you behind your back.
No Jeff, what I keep saying is that YOUR MISREPRESENTATIONS OF THEM are "Horseh*t" and "crap". You repeatedly list a whole slew of people, and claim on the flimsiest of pretexts, that they support your belief that the laws of British Monarchy determined who our citizenry would be.
You simply ignore or denounce any and all evidence to the contrary, and then wrap yourself in the Betsy Ross flag and accuse us of disputing the founders word!
We patiently and repeatedly point out to you that you have very little supporting evidence from ACTUAL FOUNDERS, and most of your evidence comes from Subsequent British lawyers who were NOT DELEGATES, and truthfully have no idea what was meant by the term "natural born citizen."
We point out to you again, that in practice, the British rule obviously didn't apply, because it didn't make 100,000 British Loyalist children into Americans, (Remember, Jus Soli doesn't GIVE YOU AN OPTION) Neither did it "Citizenize" slaves or Indians.
We Further point out to you that they had to make a SPECIAL LAW, called the "14th amendment" to make these born on the soil as children of Slaves into "citizens", an act which would be POINTLESS if your rule held.
We Further point out to you that they had to make ANOTHER SPECIAL LAW in 1924 to make Citizens out of the children of Indians, AGAIN demonstrating that your British rule did not apply.
Despite it all, you continue to insist that EVERYONE agrees with you throughout all of recorded history! and that ANYONE who disputes your claim Hates the constitution and the founders!
In simple fact, you appear to be an obsessive kook, or possibly a paid agent, though I don't think you work for the Democrats.