Well, this explains a lot of the goings on the the last week!
“Well, this explains a lot of the goings on the the last week!”
It explains more than that. It explains, for example, why some get the vapors over the mere mention of Fogbowers in our midst.
Look at it this way. Suppose you are a liberal on a conservative site, arguing for the avowed liberal position of ‘soil-only’. If by some/any means you can pass yourself off as a conservative, your argument stands a far better chance than otherwise.
Iow, if you came right out & said, “I am a bat-crap crazy ultra-lib leftist from the moonbat-central site known as Fogbow, & I am here to tell you that if you don’t accept my position of ‘soil-only’ you are a MOron’, you fail. But, if you can pass yourself off, even if only by hiding/disavowing your Fogbow ties, as a presumed conservative, you stand at least a chance.
So it makes perfect sense that some on FR would freak out over the mention of Fogbowers in our midst. The more we talk about them, the likelier most are to recognize both them & their Alinsky tactics. That spells doom for their cause, so they attempt to suppress discussion of their existence by whatever means they can.
Note to Nat (I know you’re still reading): accusing me of being crazy just for noting the presence (on FR) of Foggers is a losing strategy. The Foggers are so obvious, it requires considerably more crazy to overlook them than to acknowledge them.