A reminder:
So far there has been no plaintiff’s case on-point that survived pre-trail motions in federal court...so no trial and no witnesses or evidence will be entered into a trial record on the merits.
So no chance of Napolitano or any federal custodian of record every being compelled to testify. No “primary witnesses”...no “secondary witnesses”...no hearing on the merits!
All:
IMO, whether it is the HI DOH archive, SS archive, Selective Service archive, passport archive, INS archive, adoptive agency archive, only an insider going rogue as a whistleblower willing to commit a crime to expose a crime can place document images in public...which happens every year in the NT Times.
A whistleblower can receive some protections but usually they get “crucified” to be made an example of by the authorities (I speak from experience).
Excellent analysis!
In other words, the case can’t get to first base.
Also regarding docs being published (example: in the New York Times), there’s also Wikileaks.
Wonder if those guys have found anything :0
“So far there has been no plaintiff’s case on-point that survived pre-trail motions in federal court...so no trial and no witnesses or evidence will be entered into a trial record on the merits.”
Not true! A sitting judge appointed by Obama can be challenged and objected to because they were appointed by a usurper. Appointments of a usurper are a violation of the Appointments Clause of the Constitution. Anyone appointed by Obama can be objected to if they are scheduled to adjudicate a case if the defendant/respondent objects before trial. An objection after trial is pointless.
The defendant must merely object before trial that Obama’s appointments are unconstitutional because he is a usurper who naturalized as a U.S. Citizen during his lifetime. The Obama appointee must sustain the objection and recuse or schedule a hearing to determine if the allegation has merit. The defendant does not have to provide proof of allegation to make the objection.
Obama won’t be able to hide behind national security to prevent his immigration documents from seeing the light of day. If Obama and his appointees lie under oath and state the immigration records cannot be found or do not exist, a secondary source witness can be called to impeach the testimony of the appointees. Corroborating evidence can be obtained from Obama’s Form SS-5, application for SSN and NUMIDENT file. Certainly, Obama won’t testify his SSA records can’t be found.
The De Facto Officer Doctrine protects the government from chaos and indemnifies the government, not Obama.