Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: SvenMagnussen

“Then it’s prudent not to explain or diligently describe all aspects of plaintiff’s case in public. I’d rather Obama and Napolitano know there is a secondary source witness who can be called to impeach any primary source witness who testifies a Certificate of Naturalization was not issued to Barack Hussein Obama II and not much else.”

So far there has been no plaintiff’s case on-point that survived pre-trail motions in federal court...so no trial and no witnesses or evidence will be entered into a trial record on the merits.

A person with inadmissible hearsay testimony, such as you claim to have, cannot be called to impeach a witness who gives admissible testimony, even if that witness’s admissible testimony is false. So Napolitano and Barry have nothing to fear from you.

Inadmissible witness testimony gets onto the front page of the NY Times and other media outlets foreign and domestic because the media has the means, motive and opportunity to financially exploit juicy stories...but only if the target is too weak to strike back.


287 posted on 03/29/2013 9:13:20 AM PDT by Seizethecarp (Defend aircraft from "runway kill zone" mini-drone helicopter swarm attacks: www.runwaykillzone.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 286 | View Replies ]


To: Seizethecarp

Inadmissible Hearsay Evidence from Nolo’s Plain English dictionary ... “Testimony given by a witness who is not telling what he or she knows personally, but what others have said.”

You choose not to understand I’ve discussed an examination of a certified copy of the document and not what I heard somone talking about. You choose not to understand the recipient of Certificate of Naturalization is entitled to a certified copy of the document and may or may not share the document with others. The recipient may or may not allow others to examine the document, photograph, copy or use any electronic recording device to copy it.

Eyewitness testimony is not hearsay. The original document is under the control and possessed by individuals who may be charged with conspiracy to commit treason against the United States if the document is exposed and may have a motive to lie under oath to protect themselves. Consequently, a secondary source witness is viable and will be heard if the primary source witness lies under oath.

If the primary source witness or the defendent procures the documents and brings it to the deposition, the secondary source witness will not be heard because it is not necessary.


288 posted on 03/29/2013 7:52:10 PM PDT by SvenMagnussen (1983 ... the year Obama became a naturalized U.S. citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 287 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson