“Sven’s $3000 loan to 0bama has now grown to $30,000!!!”
I was repeatedly asked to identify a situation that would get the plaintiff past a motion to dismiss in an Obama eligibility case. I changed the amount of the loan because some ConcernedFreepers mistakenly believe I’m confessing to a personal relationship with Obama prior to 2008.
It is important to remain focused. Everytime a critic of an eligibility civil suit states the Court cannot and will not remove a sitting President, the plaintiff’s attorney needs to make it clear the case is about reimbursing the plaintiff for their loss due to the defendant’s actions.
The risk is that Court Rules dicate a settlement conference must take place before trial begins. For example, plaintiff alleges, “I had a private meeting with Obama in 2007 where we agreed I would loan him $33,873 to be repaid on or before Jan. 9, 2013.” Obama could offer to settle the matter by paying the full amount claimed, plus plaintiff’s attorney fees and court cost, without enduring the discovery process.
Then, Obama could request that the Court dismiss the case with prejudice after the settlement transaction is completed. And ConcernedFreepers and OBOTS could continue a false narrative that Obama is eligible because the Court has seen the evidence and dismissed the case!