Of course he does. He has an agenda.
I draw inferences from the fact that even when cops' bad actions come to light, there's little or no desire on the part of there departments to hold them accountable.
Of course you do, you have the same agenda. Have you ever taken the time to do a "cop sentenced" search? What can you infer from all those cases?
Suppose
A simplified hypothetical does nothing to support your LIEberTARDian case.
Most situations where cops are sentenced for crimes involve actions outside their nominal duties (e.g. dealing drugs, etc.). I'm interested in cases where cops with warrant for one address, broke into another address not listed on the warrant. Can you either offer any reason why a cop who does such a thing should not be prosecuted for robbery, or else offer a link to even one story of a cop who was so prosecuted?