Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Fred Nerks
Better check with seizethecrap before you go off on another tangent.

What tangent?? You posted the pictures that support my point. I haven't strayed from that. Again, ANYONE can do what I did and see for themselves.

You've simply exposed yourself for having photoshopped an image to further the ridiculous contention that Stanley Ann Dunham posed nude for photographs which were published in 1958 when she was still in high school.

I took TWO photos that YOU provided and simply laid one on top of the other and changed the opacity to try to see where the faces differed. The problem was that they did NOT show a compelling difference. The conclusion is undeniable. You can speculate all you want about how old she was in various photos, but the bottom line is that the faces in the photos line up perfectly. It is the same woman in both photos. I haven't made any statements beyond that as to what it means in terms of any alternate birth scenarios because the pictures don't prove anything about how Obama was born or who the father was. It is what it is and these pictures are of the same woman. It's time to quit denying the obvious and it's definitely time to quit acting like a drama queen.

641 posted on 03/05/2013 10:06:44 PM PST by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 630 | View Replies ]


To: edge919; PhilDragoo
What you are trying to tell me now is that you overlaid the image of the model (on the right in the original) over the photograph of Stanley Ann Dunham in her 'graduation' image, and aside from the her facial expression, there was no difference...

AND THIS IS YOUR RESULT. PULL MY FINGER.

658 posted on 03/05/2013 11:19:20 PM PST by Fred Nerks (FAIR DINKUM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 641 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson