[octex]

At some point the driver’s lawyer will undoubtedly claim that she did not know this guy was a real cop!
*************************************************
It’s amazing how you just make up crap to post.

The officer was not a “cop”; he was a deputy sheriff and was wearing his uniform. He was assaulted by the (now) dead woman when he tried to stop them from exiting the store and then again assaulted by the driver of the vehicle.

[muawiyah]

Actually, those are assertions ~ the evidence is in the video. Sheriff now says there's a video.

Now, about a cop not being a cop ~ this is a deputy sheriff ~ in an urban county.

Yeah, he's a cop. Semantics don't change facts unless we are talking about direction.

[muawiyah]

The term 'cr*p' is usually thought of as forbidden on FR if spelled the way you are spelling it. Makes the poster look crude and uncouth.

Also means you're probably a newbie. Right there in the bottom line a post has a number which tells you what it is a response to.

So nobody is just hopping from thing to thing to thing, but there's some coherencyhere, and if you simply go back up the chain of what a poster has entered you can usually figure out what he is responding to.

So far, on your posts, the only thing I canfigure out is you wanted to say 'cr*p'