Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Politicalmom
I don't think the dog was going to earn close to $620,000 in damages.

This needs to happen more often.

You mean PUNISHING the taxpayers instead of those who did the deed?? How is that going to deter the bad guys when someone else pays for it?

147 posted on 09/23/2012 11:46:41 PM PDT by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: GeronL

Ideally, it should be the police who pay for the damages out of their own pockets; however, this is not happening realistically.

Despite all the shootings, the laws on the matter have NOT changed, partly because the average person is not fully aware of the extensiveness of the problem.

I fully support placing the amount of damages solely on the shoulders of the person(s) responsible for such unconstitutional shootings, etc.

However, people will not demand such a law until they make the connection that “we’re paying because that power-hungry fool can’t keep his finger off the trigger”.

Most people are still fully content to worship police officers, no matter what they do. A few of them still remain on this thread.


150 posted on 09/24/2012 7:18:45 AM PDT by Altariel ("Curse your sudden but inevitable betrayal!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson