Here is a comment from the Washington Post>>>>
Interesting that the reporter did not choose to tell the whole story. The “boy” who the officers were trying to “locate” was wanted for robbery and burglary. In other words he was a fugitive. The parents knew where he was and all they had to do was point the way to the closet where he was hiding and the dog would be alive today.
But its the agenda of the Post to make law enforcement look bad and by reading these comments they have done their job.
“The jury also found that Brooks and Rector violated the couples rights by entering their home without permission after they left the house to take Brandi to the vet.”
From the article.
Would this be hunky dory for this to happen to you?
So the stupid cops shoot their dog in retaliation?
This is your justification?
What a maroon!