If you’re a “Harvard trained attorney” then why do you resort to such a blatant straw argument?
Where in this post did JimRob say that his “unmitigated opposition to Romney” was “ based on a personal religious test”? It does NOT.
The mormon stuff was a side note, but you can’t see that because you’re a mormon.
Even if he did, (and you're right, he did not) it is certainly not "unconstitutional" for an individual to use whatever test he wants to, to determine how or who he votes for. The Mormon, Harvard,lawyer is full of s###!