Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: nicmarlo

Right. And Romney’s role, should he win, is nothing more than to consolidate Obama’s gains.

We don’t have time for this sort of foolishness any longer. Too many critical components of this nation are stretched too close to the breaking point.


1,024 posted on 08/12/2012 1:22:22 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (The saving of America starts the day conservatives stop supporting what they say they hate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1020 | View Replies ]


To: EternalVigilance

A third party is not going to win at the national level. That’s a certainty. It will, however, take away from electoral votes from only one of two possible candidates who CAN win, Romney or Obama. I won’t contribute to the plan of putting a Marxist back into the White House because the GOP-e has picked another crappy statist with an “R” after his name for whom I must vote.

Now, if the Democrat was Zell Miller, I’d gladly vote third party because Zell would probably win and he’d be 90% better than Romney, but not with the certainty that the “D” who’s a Marxist will win with the same strategy.


1,031 posted on 08/12/2012 1:26:35 AM PDT by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1024 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson