Ryan is a good man, but does not redeem the abortionist/homosexualist statist Romney

Aug 11, 2012 | Jim Robinson

[Kevmo]

I have no hope of keeping up with you.

[KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle]

It’s not a race. Honest. ;)

[Servant of the Cross]

Your post brings to mind one of your other regularly overdone posts ... ergo, in the spirit of the thread ...

[Kevmo]

I submit a motion that it would be of benefit to FR if the entire idiot thread just disappeared. To The Ozone. IMHO.
***That won’t happen if you bump the thread.

The problem with this thread is that last paragraph in the article. I consider it to have been a mistake on JimRob’s part to include it. It should have had its own article in the religion section. Very few of us would have noticed it, in particular those who’ve gotten their gander up about supposed anti-mormon bigotry. And the comments would have been more subject to moderation.

But we can’t quite move it all over there.

As a servant of the cross, do you uphold the deity of Christ? Do you think Jesus was God - Jehovah? It is the denial of this very basic tenet which drives jimrob’s detractors on this thread.

[KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle]

My posting specifically referenced "supporters of liberal politicians for the office of the presidency."

My sympathies, if you somehow felt singled out.

[COBOL2Java]

Sometimes I’m amazed at how someone who believes one thing, can read such a damning revelation of facts, which reverses that belief, and then simply ignore it, and then switch to ‘so what, let’s move on to another argument then’.

- When you corner a Liberal, they quickly change topics...

---

It is amazing that almost no one knows the story in post 3312.

Romney is a closed book to the public and republican voters, a person that seems to have emerged fully grown, with almost no past or political history, to run for president as a “conservative” republican.

- I seem to recall a candidate in 2008 who had a similar, sfumato-like history...

[Resettozero]

...those who’ve gotten their gander up...

You mean those of us who've been goosed?

(You had to know something like that was coming.)

[Servant of the Cross]

My sympathies, if you somehow felt singled out.

Nah. Not feeling singled out. Just noting the irony of you posts - whining about any felt pressure on your vote while out of the other side of your mouth bad mouthing fellow pragmatic voter FReepers for their decision.

I love irony. It's so ... ironic.

[Kevmo]

What’s sauce for the goose...

[Elsie]

#3157

[Elsie]

Sorry.

I forget that not everyone has read every goofy thing in these long threads.

[greyfoxx39]

How far some have fallen. From Freeper of the Year to being ridiculed by the new leadership cabal.

Just what "year" was that? Was there a competition? Who voted? I've been here since '01 and I didn't get a vote. Was he elected by the mormon "cabal"?

Does the "Freeper of the Year" title come with a guarantee that everything issued from the keyboard of the FOTY is blessed by God? Is there a FR rule that no one is allowed to rebut the "Pearls of Wisdom" (or "Great Price") from the FOTY when they are not pearls, and certainly not wise?

[John W]

That’s funny as I am a Hoosier.

[Elsie]

I submit a motion that it would be of benefit to FR if the entire idiot thread just disappeared. To The Ozone. IMHO.

And let future researchers miss all the NAMES we've been called?

If we don't want to play; then leave!

[KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle]

whining about any felt pressure on your vote while out of the other side of your mouth bad mouthing fellow pragmatic voter FReepers for their decision.

Ah. A baseline "reading for comprehension" problem on your part, then. Gotcha.

Of course... this isn't exactly the first time you've completely managed to bumble a simple straightforward reading of what I've written, is it, now?

Now, that's "irony," weapons-grade... and with the word used correctly, to boot.

Back to your juice box, peewee.

[Elsie]

Sometimes I’m amazed at how someone who believes one thing, can read such a damning revelation of facts, which reverses that belief, and then simply ignore it, and then switch to ‘so what, let’s move on to another argument then’.

Yup; even though it IS in the Book!

---

James 1:23-24

[Elsie]

...then simply ignore it...

I think it's more than that.

The evidence is so damning they can't have it being exposed more than it had already been.

CERTAINLY don't want any more 'discussion' about it!

[Resettozero]

...whining about any felt pressure on your vote while out of the other side of your mouth bad mouthing fellow pragmatic voter FReepers for their decision.

It's not my dog and I only have this old mule to ride to the hunt but...

I think you may have posted this to the incorrect person. Doesn't ring quite right.

[Elsie]

Some folks may have indicated that is NOT an appellation to be claimed.

[KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle]

I think you may have posted this to the incorrect person. Doesn't ring quite right.

Just a several-days-delayed case of butthurt finally manifesting itself, evidently. ;)