Syncro, here’s no fewer than FORTY personal attacks and/or falsehoods on your part against myself and others... and in just ten posts. I’m not going to bother with counting the rest of your hateful and deceitful screeds to confirm even more, as they are self-evident.
Post #16
“Thanks for weighing in! (Keeping it simple so you don’t get confused)” - Personal attack
Post #20
“You are wrong again, but you like the petty namecalling don’t you?” - Falsehood, Personal attack
“Your nasty attitude is carrying over from your frustation with the Nebraska race because everyone doesn’t think like you do.” - Falsehood, personal attack
“I had to give up on your whining that I was comparing Neumann Cruz, your desire to pitch attacks stronger than your reading comprehension.” - Falsehood, personal attack
“Now trolling, LOL!” - Falsehood, personal attack
Post #29
“LOL, project much?” - Falsehood
“Sorry, it’s hard to communicate with those with reading comprehension problems.” - Personal attack
Post #35
“You have me mixed up with someone else. I never had anything to do with those fantasies.” - Falsehood
“It seems a lot of posters want to tell me what to do, and what I have done even if it isn’t true.” - Falsehood
Post #36
“You guys are horrible examples of “conservatives”” - Personal attack
“If someone doesn’t go along with your opinions, you attack them.” - Falsehood
“No problem, you are both dismissed.” - Personal attack
“BTW, I am mingling with hundreds of WI Conservativers/Tea Partiers that support Neumann. Which you both seem to want to ignore.” - Falsehood
“So you throw fits and attacks.” - Personal attack
Post #37
“Should get the malcontents going...” - Personal attack
Post #41
“I don’t have time to discuss issues with those that twist what I say into what they want to believe in order to attack my statements.” - Falsehood (carrying on a flamewar for a week)
“Or in the case of this Senate race those that INSIST that NO tea partiers in WI support Neumann.” - Falsehood
“Instead of spending time attacking me,” - Falsehood
“why don’t the bunch of you get out on the ground and support your choices? Or at least post links here to threads you guys have started in order to support your candidates.” - Already done, so false claim
“Not biting or buying into your sideshow, Bob.” - Personal attack
Post #46
“Again, more false attributions and downright lies about what I have posted and what is going on in WI” - Falsehood
“I am on the ground here letting you know how many tea party conservatives and others not tea party people that support Mark Neumann and you still deny those facts.” - Falsehood, nobody made such denials
“So now you lie about me and attack me, and ping Jim Robinson?” - Falsehood on claims about lies and attacks
“How weak.” - Personal attack
“Are you trying to get posts removed like one of your cohorts did?” - Falsehood
“I read one of the posts before it was removed, and it was un unwarrented lying attack on me.” - Falsehood and personal attack
“Oh and no, I didn’t report it.” - Dubious claim, possible falsehood
“I’d rather the vicious misleading posts by you and the others that hate Neumann...and apparantly me too...stay up so readers can see how out of line those that don’t support Neuman ar(e)” - Falsehood and personal attack
“No wonder Neumann has positive supporters and not name callers and posters of lies like we can see on this thread.” - Falsehood and personal attack
“I’ll answer your misleading long post later when I have time, right now I’m going back out to watch Neumann speak
because the enthusiastic applause is too distracting to continue posting.” - Falsehood on “misleading”
“How about you reporting what you are doing on the ground here, or do you not go outside much?” - Personal attack
Post #60
“Interesting you don’t respond to any of the positive proof that many in WI support Neumann such as in This and several other posts.” - Falsehood
“But you deny any of that happened, so I understand.” - Falsehood
Post #62
“Perhaps your post was removed because it was an over the top personal attack on me which the mods decided was not wanted here at FR.” - Falsehood
“BTW, I have NEVER hit abuse on anyone for any personal reasons ever.” - Dubious claim, potential falsehood
“So I guess maybe someone else saw your sick personal attack on me and reported it.” - Falsehood and personal attack
“The second one removed, when I got back to the thread it was already removed, but I imagine it was another attack.” - Falsehood
“Defend your self against my “derangement” LOL! Nice strawman.” - Falsehood on “strawman”
“Sorry my posts are so hard to respond to in a decent manner so that you have to make this issue about me instead of it’s intended purpost.” - Falsehood
“Heck, if you really think I am attacking you PERSONALLY on this thread, push abuse on the attack posts. I can’t really find any, but go for it.” - Falsehood
“It does seem that the first sentence (a quote of yours) applies to you and a couple of other posters rather than me.” - Personal attack
Post #16 “Thanks for weighing in! (Keeping it simple so you don’t get confused)” - Personal attackGood start. That was posted because of your refusal to understand that when I said this thread was like a Cruz thread a whle back, I meant the style of replies.
You continued on insisting that I was comparing Neumann to Cruz.
So I thought posting a nice simple reply to you would prevent you from changing the meaning of what I posted to what you wanted it to be so you could chastize me.
And then the personal attacks and lies were started by you: "You’re being a schmuck again. I had to drag you practically kicking and screaming into realizing you were wrong in Nebraska"
Now that that is brought up again, you have NEVER "drag(ed) me kicking and screaming etc" anuywhere.
I wasn't wrong in Nebraska, just had a different candidate then you did.
Post #20 “You are wrong again, but you like the petty namecalling don’t you?” - Falsehood, Personal attackWrong again. The petty namecalling started by you in post #17: "You’re being a schmuck again"
So itwas not a falsehood, nor a personal attack. It was calling you out for name calling.
“Your nasty attitude is carrying over from your frustation with the Nebraska race because everyone doesn’t think like you do.” - Falsehood, personal attackSorry, my bad. I think it must be some other issue that brings on your nasty attitude>
“I had to give up on your whining that I was comparing Neumann Cruz, your desire to pitch attacks stronger than your reading comprehension.” - Falsehood, personal attackIt's obvious your reading comprehension was lackking, as explained a few sentences up. So no false hood, and no personal attack. Unless saying you were whining made you feel attacked.
“Now trolling, LOL!” - Falsehood, personal attackOh my, it was YOU that said I was Now trolling! So yes, a falsehood, I wasn't trolling. And yes a personal attack. You calling me a troll!
You should listen to others here about this race, otherwise you’re just trolling.Now that is pretty bold. Posters are trolling if they don't go along with what a couple of other posters say.
17posted on Sunday, August 05, 2012 9:50:36 PMby fieldmarshaldj(If you like lying Socialist dirtbags, you'll love Slick Willard)
Sorry, I think for myself, and don't see myself following you and your posse's suggestions.
This if Free Republic. We don't all fall in line like sheep. Well, not all of us.
Post #29 “LOL, project much?” - FalsehoodYea right. Many of your posts to me were projections of exactly what you were doing. I doubt you will ever see that, but no biggie.
Post #35 “You have me mixed up with someone else. I never had anything to do with those fantasies.” - FalsehoodYou are digging a pretty deep hole.
That response was an answer to a false statment by another poster about me, namely that I participated in the FReeper Fantasy Baseball League. I never participated in that, in fact paid no attention to it at all.
“It seems a lot of posters want to tell me what to do, and what I have done even if it isn’t true.” - FalsehoodYou and many other posters have been telling me not to support Neumann, so the first part of your false accusation is not true at all. Gimme me a break, you really beleive what you are writing???
And you yourself stated many times that I compared Cruz with Neumannm, and I NEVER did that.
So more "falsehoods" shot down.
Post #36 “You guys are horrible examples of “conservatives”” - Personal attackNo, personal opinion from observing you and your cohorts' coarse and hateful debating techniques
“If someone doesn’t go along with your opinions, you attack them.” - FalsehoodOh quite true. I provide a list at the end of this post. Won't be able to post the real nasty ones, they were removed.
“BTW, I am mingling with hundreds of WI Conservativers/Tea Partiers that support Neumann. Which you both seem to want to ignore.” - FalsehoodOK, then I can understand that you now realize that there were hundreds of Neumann supporters that I mingled with? Good, were getting someplace now.
Post #37 “Should get the malcontents going...” - Personal attackGood. You recognize yourself as one of the malcontents. Some vicious attack...malcontents!
Post #41 “I don’t have time to discuss issues with those that twist what I say into what they want to believe in order to attack my statements.” - Falsehood (carrying on a flamewar for a week)Already explained earlier in this post. Wasn't it you that brought up the "flame war" in the Nebraska thread from much longer than A WEEK ago! Pot/kettle
“Or in the case of this Senate race those that INSIST that NO tea partiers in WI support Neumann.” - FalsehoodGlad to see you now know that there are tea parties in WI that support Neumann. I saw hundreds of tea partiers there that did.
“why don’t the bunch of you get out on the ground and support your choices? Or at least post links here to threads you guys have started in order to support your candidates.” - Already done, so false claimThat's easy to say, but proof would be nice. You know that I have been doing that.
“I read one of the posts before it was removed, and it was un unwarrented lying attack on me.” - Falsehood and personal attackOh BS! Of course it was. This is in the smokey back room now, why don't you ask the mods to restore the post where you did that lowly personal attack on me? Afraid for others to see it?
Just push the abuse button and ask. Or ping Jim Robinson, you like to do that.
Post #46 “Again, more false attributions and downright lies about what I have posted and what is going on in WI” - FalsehoodLOL, they are all over the thread!
“Oh and no, I didn’t report it.” - Dubious claim, possible falsehoodYou really want it to have been me don't you? LOL! Sorry, it didn't bother me at all, I liked it on the thread. It shows what kind of person you are.
“I’d rather the vicious misleading posts by you and the others that hate Neumann...and apparantly me too...stay up so readers can see how out of line those that don’t support Neuman ar(e)” - Falsehood and personal attackNope, just the facts. Come on, ask the mods to put the posts with the personal attacks from you to me back up!
“I am on the ground here letting you know how many tea party conservatives and others not tea party people that support Mark Neumann and you still deny those facts.” - Falsehood, nobody made such denialsI'm glad you are coming around to the facts. Cool.
Post #62 “Perhaps your post was removed because it was an over the top personal attack on me which the mods decided was not wanted here at FR.” - FalsehoodMan, it sure would be nice to have that post back on the thread!
“BTW, I have NEVER hit abuse on anyone for any personal reasons ever.” - Dubious claim, potential falsehoodSome of us are just naturally truthful. Maybe it is projection that you think I have done that? You may lie about stuff like that, but I don't.
“The second one removed, when I got back to the thread it was already removed, but I imagine it was another attack.” - FalsehoodEasy for you to say, the mods thought it bad enough to remove it.
“Defend your self against my “derangement” LOL! Nice strawman.” - Falsehood on “strawman”Great, there is another personal attack on me. (or more projection...?)
“Sorry my posts are so hard to respond to in a decent manner so that you have to make this issue about me instead of it’s intended purpose.” - FalsehoodSince the hijacking started, you and your posse have spent a lot of time making this thread about me.
“Heck, if you really think I am attacking you PERSONALLY on this thread, push abuse on the attack posts. I can’t really find any, but go for it.” - FalsehoodI looked, and none of my "attacks" have been removed. Go ahead hit the abuse button, make a mod's day! LOL
“It does seem that the first sentence (a quote of yours) applies to you and a couple of other posters rather than me.” - Personal attackOh it certainly did apply to you and your tag team buddies!
Now that I have responded to almost all of your complaints, I will post you attacks on me. But first let me say, you certainly are thinskinned if you think all of those were vicious personal attacks upon you!