Replies

...but alternative narratives must coherently account for both date and place, or try to narrow down the range of both date and place.

I'm not a researcher trying to find stuff, I'm just a reader and learner trying to learn. IMHO the way to find the truth is not by trying to make an alternative narrative, but rejecting every single bit of "info" that is not independently verified by non-0bama supporters and/or mere hearsay, rejecting the info on any documents many (non 0bama supporting) investigators say to be forgeries, and starting with a clean slate. Trying to force bits of info - some real, some not, some twisted - into a "narrative" is counter productive. The best way is to find whatever info is out there, sift it through, and whatever is verified, it's a part of the puzzle. The picture or narrative may not be clear for some time. By trying to force info into any narrative is a method that insures failure.

There is no comparable consistent alternative birth date given by Barry or his agents that I have seen.

See above for why "narratives" are useless. People need to look for factual info that relates to any and all characters, peripheral or major, and if the info doesn't "fit" a narrative, get rid of the narrative. Just find info that is not false, and see what picture emerges. Anything else - having a story in mind, and forcing bits of info into the story and rejecting any info as "false" that doesn't fit - bad, bad method.

“Trying to force bits of info - some real, some not, some twisted - into a “narrative” is counter productive.”

I disagree. In forensics, narrative is called the “theory of the case” and it must be sequentially logical and coherent. The famous “means, motive and opportunity” is a shorthand statement of what a narrative placing a person at a crime scene able to commit the act.

Each actor in the Barry saga (father, mother, Barry) has a real-life 1960-61 narrative including the journalists shorthand list of who, what, when, where, why, how all of which must make sense.

The BHO Sr.-SADO-Barry narrative is very nearly complete, IMO, with the exception of where was Stanley Ann between Feb 2, 1961 and late August 1961, the dates she was last claimed to have been accounted for in the FOIA documents.

For the Mal-Val narrative, there is no coherent narrative and only a morphing pair of images in a Dr. Polland youtube with no forensic value.