NOTE: THE ADDRESS LISTING IS FOR ANNA OBAMA.
NOTE: THE ADDRESS LISTING IS FOR ANNA OBAMA.
EXCERPT:
Careful historian Maraniss might more accurately be described as an "enabling dissembler." By looking at the three versions of the "visit," it is clear that as conflicting facts have been discovered, recollections have been conveniently modified to fit them. From the initial version of a young woman, "crazy in love," stopping off in Seattle in 1961 on her way to see her beloved in Boston, who by the way wouldn't be in Boston for another year, we find out that the "visit" really happened a year later in August 1962 -- and when it becomes clear that Ann moved to Seattle and was never on her way to see her husband in Boston, we wind up with a totally innocuous story reset to 1961 of two friends visiting one afternoon for an amiable chat.
It is clear that people are lying. It is clear they are lying to protect a fraudulent story. It is clear that the official Obama nativity story is bunkum. Those who have orchestrated this cover-up should be ashamed of themselves for trying to fool us.
We should be ashamed of ourselves if we allow them to do it. Read more:
Not Stanley Ann D. Obama, either. Attempts to make it appear that SAD used the name “Ann” or “Anna” fall flat every time they’re tried.