OWH was fos, you can do anything you want, what he neglected to say was that there are repercussions for doing it.
BTW, you can yell fire in a crowded theater with no repercussions...if there really is a fire.
In fact, if you knew there was a fire and didn't warn the peoples you would be responsible for the consequences.
Tossing a handful of lit firecrackers into a Batman matinee this weekend would probably be prosecutable as a top-level felony.
Why is it that when talking about gun ownership, the sport of hunting and home protection are assumed to be the only purposes for owning weapons?
The most eloquent explanation of the Second Amendment, Ive ever heard is that, The Second Amendment is the reset button of the Constitution.
Where I went to school and my personal readings of the Federal show that the Founding Fathers included the Second Amendment because of their justified distrust of large, central governments; so they included the Second Amendment to allow the American to face a large, central government, hostile to the wants and demands of the people, much like we have today.
I forget the name of the Senator, who said they had no problem with people owning weapons used for hunting, but felt rifles, as the AR-15, AR-10, etc, should not be allowed.
I personally owned both of the aforementioned rifles and must say that they are both my favorite rifles to fire, with the exception of my Savage 10, when shooting from the 500 meter line.
An education program is much overdue to let the American people know what the intent of the Founding Fathers were and to never allow ourselves to be lulled into thinking that our government is a benign, benevolent government, whose only purpose is to help us.