Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: kaila

Thanks, kaila, I wasn’t aware of any of that. So Haydock had no authority in the situation and was merely acting as a family friend.


133 posted on 02/26/2012 2:05:26 PM PST by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies ]


To: smoothsailing
So Haydock had no authority in the situation and was merely acting as a family friend.

I will bet you dimes to donuts that IF this goes to trial, the court is going to place greater weight upon the word of that ER physician, than they're going to place on the allegations of two nurses who attempted to forcibly yank a child from the arms of it's father while falsely claiming a 'code pink' (child abduction) was in progress.
135 posted on 02/26/2012 2:09:29 PM PST by mkjessup (Romney is to conservatism what e.coli is to an all-you-can-eat salad bar. NO ROMNEY!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies ]

To: smoothsailing

Yes.
If he has priviledges at that hospital, and he encouraged Kennedy to take the baby, he could get into trouble with hospital administration.
He had no business trying to pull his weight in the nursery. He was out of his field of expertise, was not trained in policy or procedures of that unit.
The nurses could have told him to get lost, and he would have to comply.
Just because you have MD after your name, does not mean that you have ultimate power in other units not in your work enviroment.


136 posted on 02/26/2012 2:11:26 PM PST by kaila
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson