To: smoothsailing; kaila; All
A very interesting post. It does establish that Kennedy was in fact accompanied by a physician, and the fact that he was a family friend is irrelevant. In the pecking order of hospitals, the directives and instructions of physicians are sacrosanct, and this backs up the appearance of the nurses going into thug mode and throwing their weight around. Defying the instructions of a hospital doctor in good standing (especially one with ER credentials) ought to get their asses bounced right on out of there.
In the www.necn.com report of this event, it was stated that "attorneys for both sides agreed that the infant was in fact, unharmed" and the alleged 'violent shaking of the infant's head' was not in fact proven to have occurred.
Of course down the street at Kaila Memorial, the doctor would be fired because he 'obviously' advocates violence towards women.
128 posted on
02/26/2012 1:59:12 PM PST by
mkjessup
(Romney is to conservatism what e.coli is to an all-you-can-eat salad bar. NO ROMNEY!!!)
To: mkjessup
If the physician is not a neonatologist,or an OB, with priviledges as that hospital- then his opinion means squat.
The nursery nurse has more power than the ER physician in that situation.
131 posted on
02/26/2012 2:03:13 PM PST by
kaila
To: mkjessup; kaila
A very interesting post.It does establish that Kennedy was in fact accompanied by a physician.It "establishes" that Haydock was with Kennedy and the baby initially. It makes no mention of Haydock's whereabouts while Kennedy was in the elevator, heading for the stairwell door, running down the stairs, being stopped by security, or being escorted back to the nursery. That was all "established" too. But it's a police report based on the nurse statements, so what has really been established?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson