Posted on 10/02/2011 12:45:46 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Yep...especially given that these left wing idiots exist only in their little fantasy filled bubbles.
Hey, Frances! You are already getting one. It’s called CONSERVATISM!!!! BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
If they try to suspend the election for ANY reason whatsoever, violent revolt is the duty of every American. The alternative is to accept dictatorship. To allow the SLIGHTEST deviation is to let them use anything for an excuse. An earthquake, a 9/11 event, a market crash, whatever.
It will not stand if they try it.
That's what's panicking them in the middle of the night.
"None of us know the exact formula for when those movements erupt."
No she doesn't, which is why she and her doomed oligarchical compatriots need to artificially froth up her community-organizing brain-washed cultist minions into a mindless frenzy of anarchy to war against the morally responsible, law-abiding, Constitutionally-minded, "popular uprising" known as the Tea Party.
OMG!!! Democrats are ugly on the inside AND outside!!
We’ve got one Frannie you commie ho. It’s call the TEA Party.
Frances Frances, we already have a popular uprising it is called the Tea Party and we will bury you and your’s in Nov 2012.
Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:
Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.
They have insisted on calling that "We, the People's" movement a "Party," describing it in derogatory terms, in their attempts to delegitimize its effectiveness. The President and his cohorts, including Piven, do not subscribe to the premise that American citizens who pursue a return to America's Founding principles make up a legitimate "movement."
They are like the blind men who placed their hands on different parts of an elephant and came away with widely disparate definitions of what it was.
Inasmuch as the founding ideas of American liberty embrace a large body of thought which is foreign to that of the writers they have studied (Mao, Marx, Lenin and Keynes), they have no definition for the millions upon millions of citizens who now are united in a desire for freedom, opportunity for all, and the passing on of the torch of libery to future generations.
They bring the "we are who we've been waiting for" concept of Obama, without acknowledging the magnificent inheritance of liberty in America which preceded them.
The "movement" they wish for will bring only strife, unrest and division. The movement centered around America's founding ideas will bring what it brought in 1787: a kindling of the light of liberty for present and future generations.
There is one positive thing to come out of the Obama presidency, and that is we now know exactly who the subversives are in this country, and they should never be allowed to hold office again!
Indeed we do. It started with those sham “town halls” the other year. I was really excited.
BTW...
“None of us know. I study movements. None of us know... “
Hey, intellectual. It’s “...none of us knowS...”
She is right—we do need a popular uprising to rid the land of would be Stalin’s and communists. Fighting in the streets may well happen—whole Liberal institution should be targeted— If things get bad the Tea Party people will not run—they are made up of Patriots. The elections will happen—even if they are held with a show of hands.
Where did you get the idea that Keynes should be lumped together with Marx, Lenin and Mao?
It’s one thing to disagree with Keynes prescriptions, but the idea that he has anything in common with those three is preposterous. Keynes wove a theory out of ideas that had been discussed by classical economists since the days of Adam Smith and David Ricardo, the theory of ‘general gluts’ in particular.
Rational criticisms fault Keynes and his school for all sorts of things- putting too much faith in macroeconomic modelling, ignoring monetary factors, employing demand management while ignoring supply constraints. But none of it is marxism and whoever led you to believe that is teaching you nonsense.
The idealism of some does not justify the violation of natural rights of others by force and aggression.And the victims of the violence have the perfect right to use force to defend themselves.
I’m not sure they really want to go there. Seriously.
To Piven (of communist Cloward-Piven?)
We have a popular uprising.
Some tea?...
That is one ugly stick creature.
Hey, whoa, there’s a difference. One of them is a wrinkled mutant power-mad fiend with an army of robotic idiots looking to take over the universe. The other one’s a guy in a rubber mask.
She says she studies movements. I can produce a movement that she can study away on.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.