As usual, the libs are missing the point. I was born with or developed quite a few urges, not all of which match God’s word. For example, during my several decades of marriage, I have many times seen a woman other than my wife, noticed that she was beautiful, felt certain urges, and . . . done nothing about it. The nice thing about being a Christian with free will is that I can choose my own actions. The nice thing about putting my trust in God is that I know He has made better decisions for me than I would make for myself without His guidance, so I continue to choose to follow His word. Whether the negative urges we are born with lead in the direction of homosexuality/bisexuality, or in the direction of adultery, gluttony, avarice, or anything else that is incompatible with God’s word, we can choose. Unlike liberals, good Christians know that we are free to choose their own actions and paths through life. We may make occasional mistakes, but we learn from them rather than wallowing in and celebrating them. I don’t think that Sarah would have any trouble at all raising a child who was born with a tendency in the direction named by the author, even if you assume that a baby can be gay. [And, no, I don’t think Sarah would abort a baby over that flaw either - she would instead guide the child as he grew.]
bfl