[don-o]

You don’t get what we do here, do you? We look at the available facts and express opinions. The facts that are known lead almost everyone on the thread concluding that the cops messed up.

Except for you. Problem is you have nothing except animus against a “bigshot lawyer.” Not that there’s anything wrong with such animus - but, that alone can’t get these Goobers off the hook.

Now, how about that bet? FR needs the $$.

[buccaneer81]

Now, how about that bet? FR needs the $$.

He's going to tell you that some Democrat ambulance chaser took all his money when he was sued for being a corrupt cop.

[macquire]

So we look at available facts and express opinions (X THAT OUT) and DRAW CONCLUSIONS then stick with them.

Ever see the movie Twelve Angry Men?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twelve_Angry_Men

What you have as “facts” is an 8 page letter copied to a dozen people just THREE DAYS after the incident. When that letter failed to get released to the public by what the attorney was hoping, one of the many copied, HE brought it to blog to get publicity!

[presently no screen name]

Problem is you have nothing except animus against a “bigshot lawyer.”

Sorta goes hand-in-hand with the cop's 'fancy car' derogatory comment.