Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: presently no screen name

Funny. We have a half dozen “freepers” believing 110% of what the John Edwards supporting lawyers wife says, right down to how long SHE says it took the cop to turn her car off but NOTHING the officer said.

Maybe a half dozen that don’t think America’s Finest are America’s Finest need to go to some support groups of the Officers that have fallen. They then might find something in themselves they lost decades ago.


199 posted on 07/03/2011 5:36:13 PM PDT by macquire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies ]


To: macquire

Do you have a problem with staying on topic? You are all over the place.

Since you have been proven wrong over and over again - you are now trying for the sympathy vote~ LOL~

0.00 - live with it~!


202 posted on 07/03/2011 5:41:47 PM PDT by presently no screen name ( The Palin Party: The Party of Patriots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies ]

To: macquire

“Americas finest”?

lol

They threw that away when they gave up being ‘peace officers’ for the more lucrative ‘law enforcement’.

Sadistic bullies, the whole lot of them. IMHO.


211 posted on 07/03/2011 6:02:01 PM PDT by glasseye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies ]

To: macquire

I know A LOT of good Police Officers. I’m good friends with four.

At any rate it’s cops like these dip$hits that give all cops a bad name. Instead of defending this jackboot thug you should be condemning it.


219 posted on 07/03/2011 6:07:47 PM PDT by Sprite518
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies ]

To: macquire

Dude, you are dense.The officer claims he smelled alcohol on her breath, but mere MINUTES late, not hours, but minutes late she blows a 0.00 on the breathalyzer. ZERO point ZERO ZERO. Forget the statements on BOTH sides.

She blew a 0.00. You can’t get around that no matter how hard you try.

OK, believe the cop. He didn’t pull her over for weaving or driving erratically. He claims he pulled her over for something that has nothing to do with alcohol.

He claims she had alcohol on her breath, but she blew a 0.00.

At a minimum, they have NO CASE against her for anything. I’ve been on FreeRepublic for 10 +years. I’ve never seen anyone argue such a losing cause.


273 posted on 07/03/2011 9:50:31 PM PDT by Bryan24 (When in doubt, move to the right..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies ]

To: macquire

Dude, you are dense.The officer claims he smelled alcohol on her breath, but mere MINUTES late, not hours, but minutes late she blows a 0.00 on the breathalyzer. ZERO point ZERO ZERO. Forget the statements on BOTH sides.

She blew a 0.00. You can’t get around that no matter how hard you try.

OK, believe the cop. He didn’t pull her over for weaving or driving erratically. He claims he pulled her over for something that has nothing to do with alcohol.

He claims she had alcohol on her breath, but she blew a 0.00.

At a minimum, they have NO CASE against her for anything. I’ve been on FreeRepublic for 10 +years. I’ve never seen anyone argue such a losing cause.


274 posted on 07/03/2011 9:50:40 PM PDT by Bryan24 (When in doubt, move to the right..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson