To: muawiyah; Elendur; it_ürür; Bockscar; Mary Kochan; Bed_Zeppelin; YellowRoseofTx; Rashputin; ...
Alas, the Bishop of Wurzburg was certainly in on it eh!
Eh, no. According to you and one odd, obscure text then maybe. But what weight does that carry? Your odd claims that the CATHOLIC CHURCH endorsed polygamy remain a calumny, a bizarro fantasy.
96 posted on
06/19/2011 6:02:17 PM PDT by
narses
("Fallacies do not cease to be fallacies because they become fashions." Chesterton)
To: narses
Really like to continue this but I'm in that crowd who are having a very difficult time calling up FR.
If you want me to believe the Bishop of Wurzburg did not speak for the Catholic church nor was he a Catholic, great.
Prove it.
97 posted on
06/19/2011 6:54:45 PM PDT by
muawiyah
To: narses
Really like to continue this but I'm in that crowd who are having a very difficult time calling up FR.
If you want me to believe the Bishop of Wurzburg did not speak for the Catholic church nor was he a Catholic, great.
Prove it.
98 posted on
06/19/2011 6:54:53 PM PDT by
muawiyah
To: narses
Really like to continue this but I'm in that crowd who are having a very difficult time calling up FR.
If you want me to believe the Bishop of Wurzburg did not speak for the Catholic church nor was he a Catholic, great.
Prove it.
99 posted on
06/19/2011 6:55:02 PM PDT by
muawiyah
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson