Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: conservativegramma
Yes you did. In fact, this form is the ORIGINAL SOURCE DOCUMENT so you had a mix of material on it typed at different times, on different machines.

Some analysts detect a commonality in the tab settings ~ which isn't terribly critical, but it does mean the typewriters in question were used EXCLUSIVELY in this process.

Different things happen on different days and the forms went into and out of platens several times.

You can buy off on that or not but over the years I designed or redesigned over 1,000 federal government forms, all of which were put into use by the general public, or for specific government purposes.

To do that job successfully I had to imagine every single detail of normal use ~ and supplement that with on-site field observations of people using models of the form under design, or its predecessor(s).

57 posted on 06/07/2011 7:38:47 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: muawiyah

Again you miss the point. There would be no MIX OF MATERIAL anywhere on the parts where the form would BE FILLED IN, aka typed information.

Go back and re-read the article again.

Commonality in the tab settings have nothing whatsoever to do with different sizes in the typeface or slant of the typeface.

Go back and re-read the article again.


67 posted on 06/07/2011 7:47:36 PM PDT by conservativegramma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson