[Brown Deer]

I believe that the further analysis helps to reinforce the exposure of the fraud, since it does not show any variance in fonts. You will find the same evidence in the Nordyke certificates which would have been processed at the same time, yet are inconsistent with the 0bama BC.

[Aliska]

I compared them insofar as I was able. I've not come out and pronounced it an outright fraud or forgery, "beyond my pay grade", seriously. The farthest I will go is that a lot of it is suspicious at this point. Really the first thing that set me off was that it looked so odd, then right on its heels appeared the AP version. Now some of it turns out to have logical explanations like the hash paper is required by HI law now.

Why don't I comment on other threads? I started to on 3 different topics but scrubbed them but not because I don't care. Often I'm afraid to say what I really think.

[Aliska]

Yes. But the Nordyke twins' must have been issued a long time ago. They were obviously copied from microfilm or they used to photocopy so they look like negatives. The hospital name is the same so that argument doesn't wash that it wasn't called that then. I don't understand why a different registrar signature unless one was absent that day or another possessed the same authority.

You know what? They're pretty low res so hard to analyze the same, but I pulled one up. Without firing up Photoshop, the text near the gutter doesn't appear to curve on the twin I hastily looked at just now either. The curve on the left of the document itself isn't as pronounced, but it's there nonetheless.