[muawiyah]

The article referenced at the top of the thread IS OLD. It's been out there for months. It still reads the same way today that it read back the first time I read it.

ANYONE can look at the document and see that two typewriters were used at different times AND the form got dirty along the way.

That is exactly what should be expected with a normal operation of the time.

[conservativegramma]

Gee when I click the link the article states JUNE 7, 2011. OLD eh? LOL!!! Keep digging hon, its getting comical.

Yeah anyone can look at the document and see proof of forgery, that’s never been the issue. The two typewriters, or several typewriters is proof of it.

And NO that is NEVER expected within NORMAL operations! You are an idiot when it comes to actually WORKING within an office if you pardon my saying so!